[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gnome-team] gtk+ on core-updates
From: |
Andreas Enge |
Subject: |
Re: [gnome-team] gtk+ on core-updates |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Apr 2023 13:33:06 +0200 |
Hello!
Am Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 11:14:52PM -0400 schrieb Maxim Cournoyer:
> I don't know meson that much either, but I've updated the package to its
> latest 0.12.1 version, and it passes it's test suite, so we should be
> good!
Good idea, it is also what I tend to try out first...
Repercussions trickle towards the leaves now. Maybe the Gnome team could
follow suit and fix the build errors for "guix build gnome"?
Currently I see this in python-scipy (!):
+ meson setup
--prefix=/gnu/store/i0d555a5fd7isi606aqqmbp5zgy9jh6p-python-3.10.7
/tmp/guix-build-python-scipy-1.9.1.drv-0/scipy-1.9.1
/tmp/guix-build-python-scipy-1.9.1.drv-0/scipy-1.9.1/.mesonpy-sbs19t2c/build
--native-file=/tmp/guix-build-python-scipy-1.9.1.drv-0/scipy-1.9.1/.mesonpy-native-file.ini
-Ddebug=false -Doptimization=2
ERROR Missing dependencies:
patchelf >= 0.11.0
meson-python>=0.8.1
error: in phase 'build': uncaught exception:
%exception #<&invoke-error program: "python" arguments: ("-m" "build" "--wheel"
"--no-isolation" ".") exit-status: 1 term-signal: #f stop-signal: #f>
phase `build' failed after 5.8 seconds
command "python" "-m" "build" "--wheel" "--no-isolation" "." failed with status
1
builder for
`/gnu/store/fj9pkl2hkbdczrdgjxcs95r26a3xpn68-python-scipy-1.9.1.drv' failed
with exit code 1
build of /gnu/store/fj9pkl2hkbdczrdgjxcs95r26a3xpn68-python-scipy-1.9.1.drv
failed
View build log at
'/var/log/guix/drvs/fj/9pkl2hkbdczrdgjxcs95r26a3xpn68-python-scipy-1.9.1.drv.gz'.
cannot build derivation
`/gnu/store/lichx5rphrlaf6frg3pmrr8qdz04w2k6-font-abattis-cantarell-0.303.drv':
1 dependencies couldn't be built
building /gnu/store/skvja3qaqflckk69n0yqs8jjfcrnmpxm-qemu-minimal-7.2.0.drv...
cannot build derivation
`/gnu/store/w8dsh12i22hndkm4gk7zv6dbnya6draq-gnome-42.4.drv': 1 dependencies
couldn't be built
Maybe an update would be enough here, there is a newer version.
I am also still questioning whether we should include gnome-boxes into the
gnome meta package; it is a bit surprising to have a desktop environment
depend on qemu.
Andreas