[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 04/09: gnu: mesa: Update to 23.0.3.
From: |
Maxim Cournoyer |
Subject: |
Re: 04/09: gnu: mesa: Update to 23.0.3. |
Date: |
Mon, 08 May 2023 08:08:07 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) |
Hi Christopher,
Christopher Baines <mail@cbaines.net> writes:
> guix-commits@gnu.org writes:
>
>> apteryx pushed a commit to branch master
>> in repository guix.
>>
>> commit 0be7838105806819f4586ec9130382a66a22880e
>> Author: Kaelyn Takata <kaelyn.alexi@protonmail.com>
>> AuthorDate: Thu May 4 20:12:46 2023 +0000
>>
>> gnu: mesa: Update to 23.0.3.
>>
>> * gnu/packages/gl.scm (mesa): Update to 23.0.3.
>> [source]: Remove obsolete patch and update HTTPS url.
>> [arguments]: Enable the crocus gallium driver.
>> * gnu/packages/patches/mesa-fix-sporadic-test-failures.patch: Delete
>> file.
>> * gnu/local.mk (dist_patch_DATA): Remove it.
>> ---
>> gnu/local.mk | 1 -
>> gnu/packages/gl.scm | 14 ++++-------
>> .../patches/mesa-fix-sporadic-test-failures.patch | 27
>> ----------------------
>> 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
>
> → guix refresh -l mesa
> Building the following 1954 packages would ensure 4257 dependent
> packages are rebuilt ...
>
>
> I know there's been some discussion about changing processes regarding
> changes like this that impact lots of packages, but as far as I'm aware,
> the documented process hasn't changed yet. So should this have gone to
> core-updates, and not been directly pushed to master?
There isn't currently a core-updates branch, and I need to spend some
time documenting the authorization process for how to create short lived
Cuirass branches. I think ideally we would have created a
'graphics-team' or similar branch (even the team has yet to be formed)
and let it build.
Seeing the build machines were idling in the European night, I figured I
could get away with it for this time.
But the situation will repeat; I'd like to push some xorg updates that
fix a CVE; we'll nead a 'xorg-team' branch or similar. Should we create
these branches from the maintenance repository (permanent branches) ?
--
Thanks,
Maxim
- Re: 04/09: gnu: mesa: Update to 23.0.3., Christopher Baines, 2023/05/07
- Re: 04/09: gnu: mesa: Update to 23.0.3.,
Maxim Cournoyer <=
- Re: 04/09: gnu: mesa: Update to 23.0.3., Christopher Baines, 2023/05/08
- Re: 04/09: gnu: mesa: Update to 23.0.3., Maxim Cournoyer, 2023/05/08
- Feature branches (was: 04/09: gnu: mesa: Update to 23.0.3), Andreas Enge, 2023/05/08
- Re: Feature branches, Maxim Cournoyer, 2023/05/08
- Re: Feature branches, Andreas Enge, 2023/05/10
- Re: Feature branches, Maxim Cournoyer, 2023/05/10
- Re: Feature branches, Andreas Enge, 2023/05/10
- Re: Feature branches, Andreas Enge, 2023/05/10
- Re: Feature branches, Maxim Cournoyer, 2023/05/11
- Re: Feature branches, Felix Lechner, 2023/05/08