[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Feature branches
From: |
Andreas Enge |
Subject: |
Re: Feature branches |
Date: |
Wed, 10 May 2023 11:11:20 +0200 |
Am Mon, May 08, 2023 at 10:15:56AM -0700 schrieb Felix Lechner:
> How about requiring prior to merging a feature branch that substitutes
> exist for all changed derivations? It would prevent build failures and
> preempt local builds, and thereby improve the experience for average
> users.
Taken absolutely, that sounds a bit excessive; but the idea is of course
there, the branch should be built out as much as possible.
It is probably unavoidable that some things stop working going forward,
and I wonder how realistic it is to iron out all problems before a merge.
Andreas
- Re: 04/09: gnu: mesa: Update to 23.0.3., (continued)
- Re: 04/09: gnu: mesa: Update to 23.0.3., Christopher Baines, 2023/05/08
- Re: 04/09: gnu: mesa: Update to 23.0.3., Maxim Cournoyer, 2023/05/08
- Feature branches (was: 04/09: gnu: mesa: Update to 23.0.3), Andreas Enge, 2023/05/08
- Re: Feature branches, Maxim Cournoyer, 2023/05/08
- Re: Feature branches, Andreas Enge, 2023/05/10
- Re: Feature branches, Maxim Cournoyer, 2023/05/10
- Re: Feature branches, Andreas Enge, 2023/05/10
- Re: Feature branches, Andreas Enge, 2023/05/10
- Re: Feature branches, Maxim Cournoyer, 2023/05/11
- Re: Feature branches, Felix Lechner, 2023/05/08
- Re: Feature branches,
Andreas Enge <=
- Re: Feature branches, Christopher Baines, 2023/05/10
- Re: 04/09: gnu: mesa: Update to 23.0.3., Christopher Baines, 2023/05/08
Re: 04/09: gnu: mesa: Update to 23.0.3., John Kehayias, 2023/05/09