[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: branch master updated: gnu: eudev: Use new package style.
From: |
Liliana Marie Prikler |
Subject: |
Re: branch master updated: gnu: eudev: Use new package style. |
Date: |
Mon, 29 May 2023 21:25:35 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.46.4 |
Am Montag, dem 29.05.2023 um 19:28 +0100 schrieb Christopher Baines:
>
> guix-commits@gnu.org writes:
>
> > This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
> >
> > lilyp pushed a commit to branch master
> > in repository guix.
> >
> > The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this
> > push:
> > new 7ff003bcbf gnu: eudev: Use new package style.
> > 7ff003bcbf is described below
> >
> > commit 7ff003bcbf388677c7c85b1709c58f41f84b9947
> > Author: Felix Lechner <felix.lechner@lease-up.com>
> > AuthorDate: Sun May 28 16:28:20 2023 -0700
> >
> > gnu: eudev: Use new package style.
> >
> > * gnu/packages/linux.scm (eudev)[arguments]: Convert to list of
> > G-Expressions.
> > [native-inputs]: Drop labels.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Liliana Marie Prikler
> > <liliana.prikler@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > gnu/packages/linux.scm | 94 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> > ------------
> > 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
>
> These changes do look to affect the derivation for eudev, and eudev
> also has too many dependents to update on the master branch.
>
> → guix refresh -l eudev
> Building the following 1913 packages would ensure 4138 dependent
> packages are rebuilt: ...
Should I revert it? Even with the mass rebuild, my intuition was that
it'd be okay since it's no functional change and core-updates was
dropped in favour of teams (with no particular team being responsible
for udev afaik).
Cheers