[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?
From: |
Csepp |
Subject: |
Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors? |
Date: |
Tue, 05 Sep 2023 15:12:11 +0200 |
Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> writes:
> Hi Ricardo,
>
> Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> writes:
>
>> Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@debian.org> writes:
>>
>>> The only thing clunky about this particular aspect of the workflow
>>> described is the fact that the guix community (maintainers?) have
>>> decided on a one patch per mail policy with a cover letter, rather than
>>> submitting the patches as attachments in the initial mail.
>>
>> You are right. When I started contributing I actually did attach all
>> patches in one email. I wonder why we stopped doing that.
>
> It's still allowed as far as I know. But due to missing out on
> notifying team members automatically (handled by 'git send-email') and
> sometimes causing issues for reviewers to apply patches, it's
> understandable that 'git send-email' is the most recommended option.
>
>> I’ll say that many of my gripes with (the GNU instance of) Debbugs are
>> due to the fact that we can’t customize it to better suit our needs — it
>> is a shared resource with a complicated maintenance story. So all
>> changes went into Mumi as crude workarounds. I think this is a dead end
>> and we’d be better off leaving the shared GNU instance of Debbugs
>> behind.
>
> I'd be sad to loose at least two good things from Debbugs:
>
> 1. It's hosted by the GNU/FSF for us. It always work, and the rare
> times it doesn't, the folks in #savannah are hard at work resolving the
> problems. While hosting sourcehut is probably not too difficult, keeping
> it up to date (Go...) and running would be yet another weigh on our
> meager sysadmin team.
>
> 2. Integration with Emacs. emacs-debbugs is useful. I think it's the
> only successful thing we have at keeping track of old tickets and
> resuming discussion or acting on these.
Doesn't Magit have a generic forge integration?
> I like how clean Mumi looks, compared to most forge issue trackers. I'm
> not convinced by its search results (perhaps I'd need to get to know
> what Xapian is).
- Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, (continued)
- Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, Katherine Cox-Buday, 2023/09/05
- Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, MSavoritias, 2023/09/13
- Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2023/09/02
- Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, Vagrant Cascadian, 2023/09/02
- Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2023/09/04
- Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, Efraim Flashner, 2023/09/04
- Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, Maxim Cournoyer, 2023/09/04
- Replacing Mumi+Debbugs?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2023/09/05
- Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?,
Csepp <=
- Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, Wilko Meyer, 2023/09/05
Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, Imran Iqbal, 2023/09/03
- Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, Ekaitz Zarraga, 2023/09/03
- Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, indieterminacy, 2023/09/03
- Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, Ekaitz Zarraga, 2023/09/03
- Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, Fannys, 2023/09/13
- Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, Maxim Cournoyer, 2023/09/13
- Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, Ekaitz Zarraga, 2023/09/13
- Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, MSavoritias, 2023/09/17
- Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, Simon Tournier, 2023/09/18