[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The elephant in the room and the Guix Bang.
From: |
Giovanni Biscuolo |
Subject: |
Re: The elephant in the room and the Guix Bang. |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Sep 2023 22:52:03 +0200 |
Hi,
Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> writes:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 19 Sep 2023 at 18:35, Giovanni Biscuolo <g@xelera.eu> wrote:
>
>> I'm also suspecting that the spark that started the "Guix Bang" in
>> Ludovic's mind, the very moment he realized nix could be better
>> _extended_ using Guile in place of it's DSL, was /caused/ by the fact he
>> was a Lisp programmer, the specific /dialect/ probably did not matter.
>> But I'm just guessing.
>
> Reading your paragraph, it remembers me this reference:
>
> https://archive.fosdem.org/2015/schedule/event/the_emacs_of_distros/
>
> (that I forgot when I wrote [1]).
Oh thanks! I also forgot it.
With this search restricted to guix.gnu.org :
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=%22emacs+of+distros%22+site%3Ahttps%3A%2F%2Fguix.gnu.org%2F&ia=web
I foud the relevant blog post:
https://guix.gnu.org/en/blog/2015/gnu-guix-at-fosdem/
I found a copy of the slides on the Guix site, also:
https://guix.gnu.org/guix-fosdem-20150131.pdf
Maybe a search box in the menu of https://guix.gnu.org/ would be
helpful...
...but a good search query is all we need, sometimes! :-D
Last but _not_ least, I find this is a very inspiring Emacs talk:
«EmacsConf 2021: How Emacs made me appreciate software freedom»
https://protesilaos.com/codelog/2021-12-21-emacsconf2021-freedom/
The concepts presented there are valid also for Guix, IMO
Thanks! Gio'
--
Giovanni Biscuolo
Xelera IT Infrastructures
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, (continued)
- Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, indieterminacy, 2023/09/03
- Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, Ekaitz Zarraga, 2023/09/03
- Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, Fannys, 2023/09/13
- Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, Maxim Cournoyer, 2023/09/13
- Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, Ekaitz Zarraga, 2023/09/13
- Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, MSavoritias, 2023/09/17
- Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, Simon Tournier, 2023/09/18
- contribute with content in our official help pages?, Giovanni Biscuolo, 2023/09/19
- The elephant in the room and the Guix Bang., Giovanni Biscuolo, 2023/09/19
- Re: The elephant in the room and the Guix Bang., Simon Tournier, 2023/09/20
- Re: The elephant in the room and the Guix Bang.,
Giovanni Biscuolo <=
- Re: The elephant in the room and the Guix Bang., Csepp, 2023/09/20
- Re: The e(macs)lephant in the room and the Guix Bang, Nguyễn Gia Phong, 2023/09/20
- Re: The e(macs)lephant in the room and the Guix Bang, MSavoritias, 2023/09/20
- Re: The e(macs)lephant in the room and the Guix Bang, Ricardo Wurmus, 2023/09/20
- Re: The e(macs)lephant in the room and the Guix Bang, MSavoritias, 2023/09/20
- Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2023/09/14
- Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, MSavoritias, 2023/09/18
- Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, Sarthak Shah, 2023/09/14
- Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, Simon Tournier, 2023/09/15
- Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, MSavoritias, 2023/09/13