[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: QA is back, who wants to review patches?
From: |
Christopher Baines |
Subject: |
Re: QA is back, who wants to review patches? |
Date: |
Sat, 10 Feb 2024 09:42:17 +0000 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.10.7; emacs 29.1 |
Vivien Kraus <vivien@planete-kraus.eu> writes:
> Dear QA wizards,
>
> Le vendredi 09 février 2024 à 10:44 +0000, Christopher Baines a écrit :
>> You just need to not be involved (so you can't review your
>> own patches)
>
> I interpret this as it’s OK to review patches if you asked for a change
> in the thread, am I correct? Or is this too much involvement?
That sounds fine. It's more you shouldn't review your own patches or
someone elses patches where you were significantly involved in the work.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: QA is back, who wants to review patches?, (continued)
- Re: QA is back, who wants to review patches?, Clément Lassieur, 2024/02/09
- Re: QA is back, who wants to review patches?, Tanguy LE CARROUR, 2024/02/09
- Re: QA is back, who wants to review patches?, Christopher Baines, 2024/02/09
- Re: QA is back, who wants to review patches?, Tanguy LE CARROUR, 2024/02/09
- Re: QA is back, who wants to review patches?, Andreas Enge, 2024/02/09
- Re: QA is back, who wants to review patches?, Tanguy LE CARROUR, 2024/02/09
- Re: QA is back, who wants to review patches?, Andreas Enge, 2024/02/11
Re: QA is back, who wants to review patches?, Andreas Enge, 2024/02/09
Re: QA is back, who wants to review patches?, Vivien Kraus, 2024/02/10
- Re: QA is back, who wants to review patches?,
Christopher Baines <=
Re: QA is back, who wants to review patches?, Vivien Kraus, 2024/02/10
Re: QA is back, who wants to review patches?, Ian Eure, 2024/02/11