[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Core updates status
From: |
Andreas Enge |
Subject: |
Re: Core updates status |
Date: |
Wed, 8 May 2024 12:05:19 +0200 |
Hello,
Am Mon, May 06, 2024 at 10:47:13AM +0200 schrieb Josselin Poiret:
> Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> writes:
> > I don't mind too much; when we re-enable the change we should add a
> > phase to the gnu-build-system automatically deleting/moving the libtool
> > archives. so that we're covered.
>
> I agree, although we'll have to be careful since some packages might
> need them if they don't use pkg-config!
I am a little bit confused by the suggestion; you mean removing all .la
files from all packages? I thought they were there for a reason, and
usually recorded the dependencies. For instance, doing a "guix build mpc"
and looking at libmpc.la, my impression is that I see correct information.
Why would one want to force upstream to add a pkgconfig dependency
additionally to libtool? Or do I misunderstand the suggestion?
Andreas
- Re: Core updates status, Josselin Poiret, 2024/05/05
- Re: Core updates status,
Andreas Enge <=
- Re: Core updates status, Felix Lechner, 2024/05/08
- Re: Core updates status, Maxim Cournoyer, 2024/05/09
- Re: Core updates status, Andreas Enge, 2024/05/10
- Re: Core updates status, Efraim Flashner, 2024/05/13