[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ‘core-updates’ is gone; long live ‘core-packages-team’!
From: |
Andreas Enge |
Subject: |
Re: ‘core-updates’ is gone; long live ‘core-packages-team’! |
Date: |
Fri, 6 Sep 2024 15:25:47 +0200 |
Am Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 01:35:07PM +0200 schrieb Marek Paśnikowski:
> * What if an unrelated branch gets merged before the two considered in the
> example?
That should not happened since branches are queued up in QA, see the
paragraph marked "Branches" here:
https://qa.guix.gnu.org/
> * What if a branch is worked on for a long time and the rebase itself
> becomes non-trivial?
And this is a situation we intend to avoid with the smaller branches
(of course it depends on your definition of "long time").
Andreas
- Re: ‘core-updates’ is gone; long live ‘core-packages-team’!, (continued)
- Re: ‘core-updates’ is gone; long live ‘core-packages-team’!, Christopher Baines, 2024/09/01
- Re: ‘core-updates’ is gone; long live ‘core-packages-team’!, Ludovic Courtès, 2024/09/06
- Re: ‘core-updates’ is gone; long live ‘core-packages-team’!, Simon Tournier, 2024/09/04
- Re: ‘core-updates’ is gone; long live ‘core-packages-team’!, Vagrant Cascadian, 2024/09/06
- Re: ‘core-updates’ is gone; long live ‘core-packages-team’!, Leo Famulari, 2024/09/06
- Rebasing commits and re-signing before mergeing (Was: ‘core-updates’ is gone; long live ‘core-packages-team’!), Vagrant Cascadian, 2024/09/06
- Re: Rebasing commits and re-signing before mergeing (Was: ‘core-updates’ is gone; long live ‘core-packages-team’!), Leo Famulari, 2024/09/07
- Re: Rebasing commits and re-signing before mergeing (Was: ‘core-updates’ is gone; long live ‘core-packages-team’!), Vagrant Cascadian, 2024/09/07
- Re: ‘core-updates’ is gone; long live ‘core-packages-team’!, Christopher Baines, 2024/09/06
- Naming “build train” instead of “merge train”?, Simon Tournier, 2024/09/09