[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Guix on the MNT/Reform
From: |
pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) |
Subject: |
Re: Guix on the MNT/Reform |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Mar 2025 14:36:23 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Hello all; regarding dystopian direction;
Christine Lemmer-Webber <cwebber@dustycloud.org> writes:
> The modularity of the Reform design is the most hope I have for a FOSS
> future on the otherwise largely dystopian direction of hardware lately.
> Hopefully we will get better and better options over time for the SoCs
> too.
I guess DDR4 RAM suffers from board-specific cross-talk and that is the
main reason for free software support getting worse. Maybe firmware is
made with proprietary board information to avoid cross-talk. Maybe free
firmware could be made with time-intensive testing of the particular
board, each time the firmware is built. Maybe instead of the real
board, a virtual board “digital twin” could be used for training, which
would be free software if the virtual board would only coarsely resemble
the real non-free board.
Maybe USB3 has similar cross-talk?
But anyway, I guess the present is not really worse than the older,
slower, flaky boards with full U-Boot free software support.
Regards,
Florian
- Re: Guix on the MNT/Reform, (continued)
- Re: Guix on the MNT/Reform, Vagrant Cascadian, 2025/03/17
- Re: Guix on the MNT/Reform, Vagrant Cascadian, 2025/03/18
- Guix on the MNT/Reform Status Update, Vagrant Cascadian, 2025/03/23
- Re: Guix on the MNT/Reform Status Update, Andreas Enge, 2025/03/26
- Re: Guix on the MNT/Reform Status Update, Vagrant Cascadian, 2025/03/27
- Re: Guix on the MNT/Reform, Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli, 2025/03/19
- Re: Guix on the MNT/Reform, Vagrant Cascadian, 2025/03/20
- Re: Guix on the MNT/Reform, Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli, 2025/03/24
Re: Guix on the MNT/Reform, Christine Lemmer-Webber, 2025/03/18
Re: Guix on the MNT/Reform, Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli, 2025/03/19