[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#36322] [PATCH 0/4] [core-updates] Fix cross-compiling bootstrap tar
From: |
Marius Bakke |
Subject: |
[bug#36322] [PATCH 0/4] [core-updates] Fix cross-compiling bootstrap tarballs |
Date: |
Fri, 21 Jun 2019 14:24:11 +0200 |
With these patches, we can again cross-compile the bootstrap tarballs on
core-updates.
As of commit bd0dc2df04a1550f41d3d5c7cc2c26ad12468b36, here are my
results for armhf and Hurd(!):
$ ./pre-inst-env guix build --target=arm-linux-gnueabihf bootstrap-tarballs
/gnu/store/q245c0s6cc55ziamfxpv43lwbnxaw0n6-bootstrap-tarballs-0
$ guix hash -rx $(!!)
01lksw8qw973bc2lllz97pxm67x84rz8crbdiqwnlbyjq0j3mvaq
$ ./pre-inst-env guix build --target=i586-pc-gnu bootstrap-tarballs
/gnu/store/4i3zxmzcrpg2h8inwgfd24sdsgan9jw7-bootstrap-tarballs-0
$ guix hash -rx $(!!)
17yjlqvwlv8v28qm5v888kshx30djylml9fgpwkcqvx3idzw7i1v
Now, I haven't actually tried bootstrapping a system from these yet.
Do we have automated tests for that?
Marius Bakke (4):
gnu: make-bootstrap: Remove obsolete header file.
gnu: make-bootstrap: Restore cross-compilation workarounds.
gnu: make-bootstrap: Adjust for GCC 7.
gnu: bootstrap-tarballs: Don't include the native mes when
cross-compiling.
gnu/packages/make-bootstrap.scm | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
guix/build/make-bootstrap.scm | 1 -
2 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
--
2.22.0
- [bug#36322] [PATCH 0/4] [core-updates] Fix cross-compiling bootstrap tarballs,
Marius Bakke <=