[bug#39804] [PATCH] gnu: add emacs-exwm-next package (i.e. exwm for emacs-next)

[Pierre Neidhardt]

Hi Dario,

dario <address@hidden> writes:

> Thanks for your feedback.
>
>>> ---
>>>  gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>  1 file changed, 71 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm b/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm
>>> index 6b9027df8a..c6df469895 100644
>>> --- a/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm
>>> +++ b/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm
>>> @@ -8601,6 +8601,77 @@ It should enable you to implement low-level X11 
>>> applications.")
>>>  built on top of XELB.")
>>>      (license license:gpl3+)))
>>>
>>> +(define-public emacs-exwm-next
>>
>> I think you don't need to copy the whole package definition.  Instead,
>> you could `inherit' from the original definition and only adjust the
>> name, description, inputs and maybe arguments.
>>
>> For instance
>>
>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>> (define-public emacs-exwm-next
>>   (package
>>     (inherit emacs)
>>     (name "emacs-exwm-next")
>>     (inputs ...)
>>     (synopsys ...)))
>> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>>
>> See `substitute-keyword-arguments' in the fftwf package for a convenient
>> way to modify just one argument.
>>
>>> +  (package
>>> +    (name "emacs-exwm-next")
>>> +    (version "0.23")
>>> +    (synopsis "Emacs X window manager")
>
> Nice - I was not aware of that. The following definition seems to work
> (see also the patch at the end of this mail)
>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> (define-public emacs-exwm-next
>   (package
>     (inherit emacs-exwm)
>     (name "emacs-exwm-next")
>     (synopsis "Emacs X window manager using the next version of emacs")
>     (inputs
>      (cons
>       `("emacs-next" ,emacs-next)
>       (delete `("emacs" ,emacs)
>               (package-inputs emacs-exwm))))))

Maybe a bit better:

    (inputs
     `(("emacs" ,emacs-next)
       ,@(alist-delete "emacs" (package-inputs emacs-exwm))))))

>> --8<---------------cut here---------------end------------->8---
>
>>> +    (arguments
>>> +     `(#:emacs ,emacs
>>
>> Shouldn't this be `emacs-next` as well?
> I have to admit that I do not understand that part. If I change it to
> emacs-next, the build fails with the error
>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> phase `install' succeeded after 0.0 seconds
> starting phase `make-autoloads'
> Wrong type argument: stringp, nil
> command 
> "/gnu/store/1z520fgx6fiq426yf2174kal2q63a9q7-emacs-next-27.0.50-0.36abf68/bin/emacs"
>  "--quick" "--batch" "--eval=(let ((backup-inhibited t) 
> (generated-autoload-file 
> \"/gnu/store/nnjcqc448yj79dxaj11fnq7s9a8zpc1z-emacs-exwm-next-test-0.23/share/emacs/site-lisp/exwm-next-test-autoloads.el\"))
>  (update-directory-autoloads 
> \"/gnu/store/nnjcqc448yj79dxaj11fnq7s9a8zpc1z-emacs-exwm-next-test-0.23/share/emacs/site-lisp\"))"
>  failed with status 255
>> --8<---------------cut here---------------end------------->8---
> It is a bit difficult for me to understand what is going on here,
> because, like I said, I do not really understand this part of the
> package definition in the first place - sorry. However, without
> modifying the arguments, everything seems to work.

The `#:emacs` field tells the build system which Emacs package to use to
build this package.  There may be something that not compatible between
our current build system and emacs-next.

I've CC'ed Maxim and Leo, they might know more than me.

> The following patch seems to work (do I need to send it on its own? I am
> new to this type of workflow.)

Attaching to this email is fine.
Better is to use `git send-email` like so:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
git send-email --to=address@hidden --in-reply-to=<MESSAGE-ID> 0001-your.patch
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

with <MESSAGE-ID> being the message ID of the email you are replying to.
You can get this message ID in various ways: one way that always works
is to look up the "message-id" header of the raw email.

Also when you generate the patch with git, set the subject prefix to
[PATCH v2] for the second iteration, PATCH v3 for the third, etc.

Thanks!

-- 
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature