[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#40081] [PATCH] gnu: bluez: Update to 5.54.
|
From: |
Marius Bakke |
|
Subject: |
[bug#40081] [PATCH] gnu: bluez: Update to 5.54. |
|
Date: |
Mon, 16 Mar 2020 00:45:36 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Notmuch/0.29.3 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/26.3 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) |
Leo Famulari <address@hidden> writes:
> On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 07:11:35PM +0100, Vincent Legoll wrote:
>> From a84f040fd88b02b556a0fbd207f8edce1a940924 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Vincent Legoll <address@hidden>
>> Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2020 19:07:57 +0100
>> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: bluez: Update to 5.54.
>>
>> * gnu/packages/linux.scm (bluez) : Update to 5.54.
>> (bluez/fixed): remove variable.
>> * gnu/packages/patches/bluez-CVE-2020-0556.patch: Remove file
>
> Thanks!
>
> I also removed the patch from 'gnu/local.mk' and made some small edits
> to the commit message.
>
> Pushed as f24aaa81de8c709adfda2e89271c562a5ca8d959
BlueZ causes 1000+ rebuilds according to 'guix refresh -l bluez'.
Berlin already failed to build pulseaudio on armhf, leaving ARM users
without substitutes until someone is able to restart all the builds:
https://ci.guix.gnu.org/eval/11627?status=failed
https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/2390393/details
Should we revert it, or turn it into a graft?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature