[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#43699] [PATCH] guix: Fix argument order of fxbit-set?
From: |
Lars-Dominik Braun |
Subject: |
[bug#43699] [PATCH] guix: Fix argument order of fxbit-set? |
Date: |
Wed, 30 Sep 2020 08:30:51 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) |
Hi Ludo,
> The root problem is that the ‘fxbit-set?’ alias defined at the top of
> openpgp.scm had the arguments swapped compared to ‘bit-set?’. So I
> changed that alias instead of changing its users (‘fxbit-set?’ is
> defined in R6RS).
oh, okay. I looked at SRFI 143 which also has a fxbit-set? with the same
argument order as bit-set?, so I thought the alias was mimicking that API. But
this works too I guess.
Thanks,
Lars
[1] https://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-143/srfi-143.html
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature