[bug#46741] [PATCH] gnu: Return appropriate defconfig for ppc64 (non-LE)

[Efraim Flashner]

On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 03:30:00PM -0500, Carl Dong wrote:
> Hmmm does string-prefix? accept regex? And if so perhaps it should be 
> "powerpc64(le)?-“?

Definitely what I meant to write

> 
> Carl Dong
> contact@carldong.me
> "I fight for the users"
> 
> > On Feb 24, 2021, at 3:17 AM, Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> wrote:
> > 
> > On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 10:03:12PM -0500, Carl Dong wrote:
> >> * gnu/packages/linux.scm (system->defconfig): Add "powerpc64-" prefix.
> >> ---
> >> gnu/packages/linux.scm | 1 +
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/gnu/packages/linux.scm b/gnu/packages/linux.scm
> >> index c87c5ffb09..30cbebf849 100644
> >> --- a/gnu/packages/linux.scm
> >> +++ b/gnu/packages/linux.scm
> >> @@ -181,6 +181,7 @@
> >> defconfig.  Return the appropriate make target if applicable, otherwise 
> >> return
> >> \"defconfig\"."
> >>   (cond ((string-prefix? "powerpc-" system) "pmac32_defconfig")
> >> +        ((string-prefix? "powerpc64-" system) "ppc64_defconfig")
> >>         ((string-prefix? "powerpc64le-" system) "ppc64_defconfig")
> > 
> > would it make more sense to change it to "powerpc64" or "powerpc(64)?-"?
> > 
> >>         (else "defconfig")))
> >> 
> >> --
> >> 2.30.1
> >> 
> >> 
> 



-- 
Efraim Flashner   <efraim@flashner.co.il>   אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature