[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#49965] Correct Input type for Common Lisp packages
From: |
Charles |
Subject: |
[bug#49965] Correct Input type for Common Lisp packages |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Aug 2021 23:39:39 +0000 |
> I think it's the philosophy of GNU Guix to use references to the store
You're right, I see now: "propagated-inputs is useful is for languages that
lack a facility to record the run-time search path". Common Lisp has
asdf:*central-registry*. It still seems to me that propogated inputs is
more intuitive and is more portable to guix on forgein linux distributions.
I have a Centos system with guix package manager, and I had to install every
dependency manually for some packages.
Also it still doesn't fully work for me. I deleted my custom init-file.
Attatched is my shell session where I tryto use the sbcl-cl-str package.
In short: package cannot be found in ad-hoc environment; package is found
if installed, but is compiled with an newer version of sbcl: weird, but also
probably unrelated.
script
Description: Binary data
- [bug#49965] Correct Input type for Common Lisp packages, Charles, 2021/08/09
- [bug#49965] Correct Input type for Common Lisp packages, Guillaume Le Vaillant, 2021/08/09
- [bug#49965] Correct Input type for Common Lisp packages, Charles, 2021/08/09
- [bug#49965] Correct Input type for Common Lisp packages, Guillaume Le Vaillant, 2021/08/10
- [bug#49965] Correct Input type for Common Lisp packages,
Charles <=
- [bug#49965] Correct Input type for Common Lisp packages, Guillaume Le Vaillant, 2021/08/12
- [bug#49965] Correct Input type for Common Lisp packages, Charles, 2021/08/12
- [bug#49965] Correct Input type for Common Lisp packages, Guillaume Le Vaillant, 2021/08/13
- [bug#49965] Correct Input type for Common Lisp packages, Charles, 2021/08/13
- bug#49965: Correct Input type for Common Lisp packages, Guillaume Le Vaillant, 2021/08/14