|Subject:||[bug#57347] [PATCH] packages: Add man-pages-posix.|
|Date:||Fri, 26 Aug 2022 15:41:53 +0200|
|User-agent:||Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.12.0|
On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 01:50:34AM +0200, Maxime Devos wrote:This package can easily be confused with 'man-pages' -- at least, I initially confused this as a duplicate of man-pages. Could the relationship be clarified in the description?That's fair. How does this revised description sound? "Excerpts from the POSIX.1-2008 and TC1 standards (collectively, POSIX.1-2013) in manual page form. While the Linux man-pages project documents the system as it exists, this package documents the portable software API nominally implemented by many unix-likes."
'as it exists' -> 'as it exists on Linux- and glibc-based systems', as we also support the Hurd.
Otherwise looks good to me.
Right, there's a #:test-target but not #:make-target.Also, IIRC there's a #:make-target and #:parallel-build? #falseThere is a #:parallel-build? #f, but no #:make-target field, as far as I could tell. Though, the build phase doesn't explicitly target all, so it would be possible to provide the gz target through #:make-flags.
I think we could do #:make-flags "gz" for now, extending the regex to p is more of a long-term thing (while a simple change, it would cause many rebuilds and hence needs to be done on core-updates).But, also, all the build phase does is compress the manpages, which could entirely be done by the compress-documentation phase with some edits done to it; at the moment, its regex for detecting manpages doesn't take into account the p format of this package's manpages. Thoughts?
Description: OpenPGP public key
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
|[Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread]|