|Subject:||[bug#57133] [PATCH] gnu: Add rizin.|
|Date:||Fri, 26 Aug 2022 15:49:48 +0200|
|User-agent:||Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.12.0|
I do not think it's stated anywhere which one exactly, but my own interpretation of the 'license' field is 'all the relevant licenses', without any claims whether it is a 'choose this or that' situation or a 'one component is licensed as X, another is licensed as Y' situation.You can put multiple licenses in the license field, using (license (list this that foo bar ...)).For the license field, do we need to list all licenses of source code files, or the whole license of the package? And if the later, `(list license:gpl2+ license:lgpl3+)` would say the package is dual licenses, under GPL2+ or LGPL3+ at user's choice. I think with all those licenses, the whole package is under GPL-3.0-or-later. Correct me if wrong, thank you!
Description: OpenPGP public key
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
|[Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread]|