[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[bug#57133] [PATCH] gnu: Add rizin.

From: Maxime Devos
Subject: [bug#57133] [PATCH] gnu: Add rizin.
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 15:49:48 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.12.0

On 15-08-2022 03:34, 宋文武 wrote:
You can put multiple licenses in the license field, using (license
(list this that foo bar ...)).
For the license field, do we need to list all licenses of source code
files, or the whole license of the package?  And if the later,
`(list license:gpl2+ license:lgpl3+)` would say the package is dual
licenses, under GPL2+ or LGPL3+ at user's choice.

I think with all those licenses, the whole package is under

Correct me if wrong, thank you!
I do not think it's stated anywhere which one exactly, but my own interpretation of the 'license' field is 'all the relevant licenses', without any claims whether it is a 'choose this or that' situation or a 'one component is licensed as X, another is licensed as Y' situation.


Attachment: OpenPGP_0x49E3EE22191725EE.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]