[bug#61214] run-with-state and run-with-store

[Feng Shu]

> And to pass this initial state, we used `run-with-state`.  The equivalent for 
> working with
> the store is our old friend `run-with-store`!

For my poor English, I do not understand this well, does this mean
"run-with-store will call run-with-state, we just use run-with-store
generally." or "run-with-store is similer with run-with-state, they can
replace each other"?



--