[bug#49946] [PATCH v7 01/32] gnu: tree-sitter: Move to its own module.

[Pierre Langlois]

Andrew Tropin <andrew@trop.in> writes:

> [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]]
> On 2023-02-10 17:04, Pierre Langlois wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Andrew Tropin <andrew@trop.in> writes:
>>
>>> [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]]
>>> On 2023-02-09 13:39, zimoun wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, 09 Feb 2023 at 14:11, Andrew Tropin <andrew@trop.in> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I applied tree-sitter and tree-sitter-cli patches,
>>>>
>>>> Just to be sure to understand, you have only applied 02/32 and 05/32,
>>>> right?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [bug#49946] [PATCH v7 02/32] gnu: tree-sitter: Update to 0.20.7.
>>>> id:20221125012142.22579-3-pierre.langlois@gmx.com
>>>> http://issues.guix.gnu.org/msgid/20221125012142.22579-3-pierre.langlois@gmx.com
>>>>
>>>> [bug#49946] [PATCH v7 05/32] gnu: Add tree-sitter-cli.
>>>> id:20221125012142.22579-6-pierre.langlois@gmx.com
>>>> http://issues.guix.gnu.org/msgid/20221125012142.22579-6-pierre.langlois@gmx.com
>>>>
>>>> Leaving out all the others, right?
>>>
>>> Merged first 5 patches from 01 to 05, also added one more commit, which
>>> addresses some things from reviews and one commit, which adds html
>>> grammar.
>>
>> I had also started rebasing addressing comments on the tree-sitter-cli
>> package, and had a few extra changes left that haven't been pushed.
>>
>> I realised we could remove a now redundant comment, and while enabling
>> *some* tests, I realized we should directly depend on node and dot, so
>> that people may use the `tree-sitter' command, without needing them in
>> the same profile.
>
> Sounds very valid! :)
>
>>
>> What do you think of the following two patches?
>>
>
> I applied them locally and tested, LGTM.  Will push them a little later
> with the rest of tree-sitter related changes.

Cool, thanks!

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature