Re: [Gzz] ``canon3_file_format``: A canonical, N3-based file format

[Benja Fallenstein]

Tuukka Hastrup wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, Benja Fallenstein wrote:
> > 1. An absolute URI (e.g., ``http://example.org/``).
> > 2. An absolute URI plus a fragment identifier
> >    (e.g., ``http://example.org/#foo``).
> > 3. The empty URI reference (which is a relative URI
> >    refering to the current document).
> > 4. A standalone fragment identifier (e.g., ``#foo``),
> >    refering to a fragment of the current document.
>
> Could there be problems with case of the fragment identifier as well? And 
> should we require some canonicalization of the URIs?

No. Our job is to serialize an RDF graph canonically, so that we're 
later able to unserialize it to the same graph. Canonicalizing URIs 
would mean changing the graph.

Your other comments should be addressed in the PEG.

- Benja