Re: [Gzz] ``canon3_file_format``: A canonical, N3-based file format

[Tuomas Lukka]

On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 04:14:21PM +0200, Benja Fallenstein wrote:
> Tuukka Hastrup wrote:
> >On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, Benja Fallenstein wrote:
> >>1. An absolute URI (e.g., ``http://example.org/``).
> >>2. An absolute URI plus a fragment identifier
> >>   (e.g., ``http://example.org/#foo``).
> >>3. The empty URI reference (which is a relative URI
> >>   refering to the current document).
> >>4. A standalone fragment identifier (e.g., ``#foo``),
> >>   refering to a fragment of the current document.
> >
> >Could there be problems with case of the fragment identifier as well? And 
> >should we require some canonicalization of the URIs?
> 
> No. Our job is to serialize an RDF graph canonically, so that we're 
> later able to unserialize it to the same graph. Canonicalizing URIs 
> would mean changing the graph.

It'd probably be worth making this an ISSUE in the PEG.

        Tuomas