[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gzz] PEG: vocab again
From: |
Tuomas Lukka |
Subject: |
Re: [Gzz] PEG: vocab again |
Date: |
Mon, 12 May 2003 16:09:17 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 03:14:00PM +0300, Matti Katila wrote:
> On Mon, 12 May 2003, Tuomas Lukka wrote:
>
> > Overall changes
> > ---------------
> >
> > Create new package, ``org.fenfire.vocab.lava``.
> >
> > Move most of the vocabulary entries into lava.
> >
> > Freeze ``org.fenfire.vocab``. Changes only through PEG process.
> >
> > Change the prefix ``http://fenfire.org/vocabulary/``
> > to ``http://fenfire.org/rdf-v/``.
> > After the prefix, each namespace shall contain the year and month it was
> > originally
> > defined in, in the form
> > ``2003/05/``. After that, the name of the namespace, lowercase, with .html
> > -suffix.
> > So, for instance, FF.content would be
> > ``http://fenfire.org/rdf-v/2003/05/fenfire.html#content``.
>
> And then we need a script which takes care to link every vocabulary
> to http://fenfire.org/rdf-v/?
That would be nice.
> > ALPH
> > """"
> >
> > Remove ``content``, is in FF.
> >
> > Remove ``clone`` and ``cloneType`` and ``dataType``,
> > not current/relevant.
> >
> > Remove ``xuType``, should be ``xuLinkType``.
> >
> > Then, we have left ``xuLinkFrom``, ``xuLinkTo``, ``xuLinkType``.
> > We should probably avoid 'xu' in the permanent names,
> > just in case. These should be moved to CLINK.CLink, CLINK.cLinkFrom,
> > CLINK.cLinkTo for clink, "content link", a term Ted at some point used.
>
> I think you got lost with your definitions :)
> CLINK.to and CLINK.from
> or
> CLINK.left and CLINK.rigth
You mean you want to propose different names for these?
> And what we want to say with
>
> /** ,--ALPH:xuLinkFrom -> enfilade
> * ALPH.xuType <--RDF:type --- id--<
> * '--ALPH:xuLinkTo-> enfilade
> */
>
> It's like CLINK.Pair or CLINK.Nut (or something related to fen .)
> or CLINK.container.
>
> But it's not CLINK.CLink - this is not a programming language.
Why? I don't understand at all what you're saying...
> > FF
> > ""
> >
> > Retain. Javadocs::
> > static public Object content;
>
> Should be final?
Fixed.
> > Combine to one class, CANVAS2D.
> > Rename ``Canvas`` to ``Canvas2D``.
>
> Again, 'CANVAS2D.Canvas2D' ugh..
> CANVAS2D.Canvas tells a lot more than CANVAS2D.Canvas2D.
>
> At least to me the latter one leaves a question: "And that means?"
Fixed, I like the idea.
> > PP
> > ""
> >
> > Remove everything except association. Move association to DLINK.
>
> What? Content link and dynamic link? Hmm, yes, because clink can also mean
> constant link ;)
>
> > Name comes from "Directed LINK".
>
> Ou.. that was not the first thing in mind.
Works for both, actually...
> > Javadoc::
> > /** RDF vocabulary for directed (so far typeless)
> > * one-to-one links.
> > */
> > public class DLINK {
> > /** The directed link association.
> > * A and B are linked by the tuple (A, DLINK.dLink, B)
> > */
> > static public Object dLink;
> > }
>
> Hmm, 'DLINK.dlink' - Are you sure?-)
>
> Don't take this personally but it's little funny :)
Why?
> > RDF
> > """
> >
> > Leave as is, javadoc properly. Javadoc::
>
> But it has only a 'type'. Do we want to say in public that we need only
> type of the RDF related vocabs?-)
*so far*. More can be added later.
Tuomas
- [Gzz] PEG: vocab again, Tuomas Lukka, 2003/05/12
- Re: [Gzz] PEG: vocab again, Benja Fallenstein, 2003/05/12
- Re: [Gzz] PEG: vocab again, Tuomas Lukka, 2003/05/12
- Re: [Gzz] PEG: vocab again, Benja Fallenstein, 2003/05/12
- Re: [Gzz] PEG: vocab again, Tuomas Lukka, 2003/05/12
- Re: [Gzz] PEG: vocab again, Benja Fallenstein, 2003/05/12
- Re: [Gzz] PEG: vocab again, Tuomas Lukka, 2003/05/12
- Re: [Gzz] PEG: vocab again, Benja Fallenstein, 2003/05/12
Re: [Gzz] PEG: vocab again, Matti Katila, 2003/05/12
- Re: [Gzz] PEG: vocab again,
Tuomas Lukka <=