[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Health-dev] Fw: Is the current version of Tryton far too complicated fo
[Health-dev] Fw: Is the current version of Tryton far too complicated for GNU Health?
Tue, 9 Sep 2014 19:08:40 +0100 (BST)
>Date: 09/09/2014 14:38
[Health-dev] Is the current version of Tryton far too complicated for GNU
>Hi Andrew and Luis,
>Am 09.09.2014 um 13:07 schrieb
>> Hi Luis
>> When setting up a new "Party" =
supplier (pharmaceutical wholesaler)
>> in GNU Health I am presented with tick
boxes - Person, Institution, Insurance
>> Company, Pharmacy.
>> Should GNU
Health have 2 new tick box options to facilitate
>> the ordering and issuing of
medicament and medical supplies - "Supplier" and
>> "Customer" (which may be a
customer or a patient or a ward or a clinic)?
>I think for consistency reasons
Andrew's suggestion makes sense.
>It is certainly a help for purchase clerks if
the domain of party on
>purchase order is restricted to party = supplier*.
>Further, some clinics have a shop where non-medical but health related
>products are sold (fitness stuff, consumer orthopaedics, subsidized
books about health ect.). Those could profit from a tickmark
the context of tryton sale module (or any future POS).
>* P.S.: A supplier might not be a company but a person (think
>for example) and might be a patient at the same time.
>Supplier are not mutually exclusive.
|[Prev in Thread]
||[Next in Thread]|
- [Health-dev] Fw: Is the current version of Tryton far too complicated for GNU Health?,