[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Health-dev] ICD10PCS - add to products
From: |
Chris |
Subject: |
Re: [Health-dev] ICD10PCS - add to products |
Date: |
Sun, 29 Mar 2015 20:31:59 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
Hiya!
> Agree ! The only thing is, where we draw the line... there are many
> procedures that are done in the medical practice, but won't be reflected
> on the services, or they will be reflected as part of a major / global
> service. For instance, let's think about taking the blood pressure on a
> regular visit. From the medical point of view is quite relevant, yet, we
> would include it on the encounter, and not create a dedicated line for
> it.
>
> As ususal, we have to find the balance :)
Yeah, that's a good point, and the user will ultimately need to figure
out the billing because of local laws, insurance practices, etc. Those
pesky things. Hehe.
> I think that once we have automated the link between procedures ->
> services, the billing part should be OK, since it's just marking which
> of the lines should be part of the invoice.
I agree. Whether it's the 'serviceable' attribute, or something else,
once the link is established, should be OK.
-C