health
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Health] Web Based GUI for GNUHealth


From: Raymond Omeni
Subject: Re: [Health] Web Based GUI for GNUHealth
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 23:43:48 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0

Hi David,

I appreciate your contact. What exactly do you have in mind concerning the project? I am interested in seeing GNUHealth running on a web application framework.

So how do we actualize the project?

Regards,

Raymond Omeni

On 06/30/2014 11:21 AM, David Bruchmann wrote:
Hello Raymond,

I'm answering private as my purpose is not primary related to the list.

As far as I know GNU-Health and Tryton require the application in the moment.
I verified GNU-Health long time and intensive to make a presentation
for it and sure with some commercial purpose.

The whole framework should run as web-application too, but as some
basics are included in the Tryton-Application the web-framework had to
be programmed.

Id'd like to realize that project with my partners and if you're
interested in our service we'd appreciate talking more concrete with
you.

Feel free to contact me for any questions.

Best Regards,
David Bruchmann



On 6/30/14, Raymond Omeni <address@hidden> wrote:
Hi.

In a the coming weeks I shall be making a presentation for EMR based on
GNUHealth to the Commissioner of Health in a State in my country.
Problem is that the emphasis has been on availability of Web Based Gui
for administration.
The prospective client expects access to the server by doctors using
browsers on tablets, computers etc.

Question is: Could GNUHealth be structured in a way that a single script
can install GNUHealth modules and a web GUI for administration? While it
is not my intention to make comparisons, OpenEMR has single install
packages with web GUI that makes it really easy to get the software up
and running in a very short time.

Sao GUI for Tryton has been in development for a while now as I
understand, but even Sao will require several lines of installation
instructions to get it running - the #1 hindrance for not- so- IT savvy
installers.

The OpenSUSE platform build project for GNUhealth must be commended,
though I believe that users should have the liberty of installing
GNUHealth on any linux machine that has all dependencies installed.
Also, In my opinion, locking GNUHealth to OpenSUSE because of Tryton
client-server compatibility and upgrade issues can be avoided. Instead
of a tryton client, we could have the tryton server controlled from a
web gui from any device with a browser.

I am hoping I can provide my client with the web gui -server
configuration if he finally decides to use GNUHealth.

Regards to all,

Raymond Omeni






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]