RE: [Heartlogic-dev] rumination prototype

[Joshua N Pritikin]

On Sat, 2005-05-07 at 14:03 -0500, William L. Jarrold wrote:
> I also agree with Josh's basic reactions.  I noticed a few typo
> levels things and a few places things could look cleaner.  I doubt
> I have time to go into that right now, but stay tuned.

Here's the list I used:

Jesus loves his father because Jesus is God's son.
Vienna is wet.
Rivers are a kind of water.
If water touches x then x is wet.
The Danube is a river.
The Danube runs through Vienna.
If a river runs through a region is touches that region.
Hillary Clinton feels zero dislike for Bill Clinton.
Hillary Clinton is married to Bill Clinton.
Spouses love each other.
Love is the opposite of contempt
if you feel emotion x and y is the opposite emotion of x then you feel
zero amount of y.

> ..One wuick
> reaction is it would be nice if there were a clear line or some
> graphical and/or textual element that made clear the boundary between 
> "what you already did and the next thing we want you to rate."

Hrm, a thick line seemed too heavy so I placed seven "birsd" ~.~ as a
divider.  Maybe the birds are not heavy enough.  Suggestions?

> Also, I got to the end and did not see your goal type study.

Sorry, been busy. I just published your Jack and Jill story.

> I am really psyched that we are close to launching this kind of thing.
> 
> I think we should have half of the items be reversed items too.

Reversed means adding "It is not true that ..." ?

-- 
If you are an American then support http://fairtax.org
 (Permanently replace 50,000+ pages of tax law with about 200 pages.)

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part