Re: [Heartlogic-dev] rumination status

[William L. Jarrold]

On Sun, 29 May 2005, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:

> 1. I've updated the items according to the wiki.

awesome.

> 2. You will not be asked both reversed and unreversed versions of a
> statement.

great.

hrm, checking for bugs in this is going to be hard to do.  will require
lots of test trials and lots of anality.  guess what?  it won't get 
thoroughly tested!!! (-:

if there is a bug in something complex like this hopefully we will find
it in the data.  yes, i suppose the best way to find bugs like this
is to make queries to our data. e.g. make a query like this "give me
all subjects and all itmes such that that subject has seen the reversed
and unreversed version of that item."  if we get any hits for a query
like that we know there is a bug.

bill

> --
> If you are an American then support http://fairtax.org
> (Permanently replace 50,000+ pages of tax law with about 200 pages.)