[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is C++ Variant Considered Stable?
|
From: |
Simon Richter |
|
Subject: |
Re: Is C++ Variant Considered Stable? |
|
Date: |
Wed, 28 Jun 2017 23:14:16 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 |
Hi,
On 28.06.2017 21:33, David McCallum wrote:
> Are there changes pending for variant that might break my parser somewhere
> down the road? Or is it considered safe to use?
Presumably, neither, as I haven't seen any feedback on its usefulness.
One problem is that you cannot use std::unique_ptr<T>, as the types need
to be copyable, not just movable. This is something that I could see a
possible breaking change for – but I'm not sure who would implement such
a change.
Simon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature