[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Unquoted strings in BASIC
From: |
Hans Åberg |
Subject: |
Re: Unquoted strings in BASIC |
Date: |
Wed, 4 Dec 2024 20:00:08 +0100 |
> On 3 Dec 2024, at 21:24, James K. Lowden <jklowden@schemamania.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 3 Dec 2024 17:57:13 +0100
> Hans Åberg <hans.aberg_1@icloud.com> wrote:
>
>> In general, one tries to exploit tokens to do special things, which
>> is also useful in a Bison parser when adding mid-rule actions.
>
> That's good advice, hard-won.
>
>>> it seems it is much easier to parse everything in the data section
>>> as a string
>
> I think you mean to lex each element in the DATA line, removing the
> quotes, but not distinguish between number and string? IIUC that will
> work fine. Those elements don't *have* a type until they're assigned
> to a variable; until then, they're just data, just as is true for
> any other kind of input.
I meant trying to first write a correct DATA line with the strings without
quotes, and then add a start condition for the strings with quotes. This is
more in line with use in say Scheme, and the example I gave. It could be the
numbers can be distinguished from strings without quotes, it depends on what
you want to put in them.
- Re: Unquoted strings in BASIC, (continued)
- Re: Unquoted strings in BASIC, James K. Lowden, 2024/12/01
- Re: Unquoted strings in BASIC, Maury Markowitz, 2024/12/01
- Re: Unquoted strings in BASIC, Hans Åberg, 2024/12/02
- Re: Unquoted strings in BASIC, James K. Lowden, 2024/12/02
- Re: Unquoted strings in BASIC, Hans Åberg, 2024/12/02
- Re: Unquoted strings in BASIC, Maury Markowitz, 2024/12/03
- Re: Unquoted strings in BASIC, Hans Åberg, 2024/12/03
- Re: Unquoted strings in BASIC, James K. Lowden, 2024/12/04
- Re: Unquoted strings in BASIC,
Hans Åberg <=
- Re: Unquoted strings in BASIC, Maury Markowitz, 2024/12/04