[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Other possible cfengine weak areas?
From: |
Jamie Wilkinson |
Subject: |
Re: Other possible cfengine weak areas? |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Jan 2004 17:02:24 +1100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i |
This one time, at band camp, Systems Administrator wrote:
>- Network interface setup. I wanted to be able to set up multiple
> virtual network interfaces with different IPs, based on the
> primary IP. I integrated this into the Package Management
> software above, since it already had a hosts table, and just
> needed an Interfaces table
I did this with a hideous amount of editfiles which I should probably
script; it's very prone to errors and generates a lot of stress when
people edit.
>- Service Management. I wanted something that would do the
> following pseudocode:
> if(! service started) { start service }
I use a combination of processes: and shellcommands to check if the
daemon is running, and if not define a class to restart it and do a
chkconfig on.
--
jaq@spacepants.org http://spacepants.org/jaq.gpg
Re: Other possible cfengine weak areas?,
Jamie Wilkinson <=
Re: Other possible cfengine weak areas?, David Douthitt, 2004/01/22