[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: open bugs on 2.1.14?
From: |
Christian Pearce |
Subject: |
Re: open bugs on 2.1.14? |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Apr 2005 17:04:37 -0400 |
I am submitting a bug. Woohoo!
Well anyway, there are no group or category definitions other than the
default. Can we put something intelligent stuff in?
On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 17:36 -0700, Eric Sorenson wrote:
> Can everyone who is currently experiencing a bug with cfengine please
> take a couple of minutes and do two (hopefully) quick things to help the
> community out?
>
> 1. Make sure that your bug is still present under 2.1.14 (so we have a
> baseline to work from)
>
> 2. If it is, go to http://sourceforge.net/projects/cfengine and write
> it up in the Bug Tracker.
>
> I found myself with a free afternoon today and wanted to dig into some
> cfengine bugs but it wasn't clear to me from the last week or two of
> the archives whether people got resolution on them or not.
> Specifically --
>
> - "Re: Copy/Purge exclude problem" -- was this a doc bug ('ignore' vs
> 'include' in the docs) or a real problem?
>
> - "Re: [Cfengine] Re: Problems with cfservd and SIGCHLD" -- did the
> SIG_DFL patch fix everyone's problems who saw things related to
> popen() ignoring SIGCHLD ? There were some people with defunct
> ifconfig, and other possibly-related reports.
>
> Please, if you've got open bugs, file them -- we need to bootstrap up
> the SF bugtracker and it'll just take a bit of effort to get the ball
> rolling. Thanks
>
--
Christian Pearce
http://www.sysnav.com
http://www.commnav.com
http://www.perfectorder.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part