|
From: | Tod Oace |
Subject: | server iteration |
Date: | Thu, 19 May 2005 15:23:23 -0700 |
Does anyone use the server= iteration? I'm not seeing how it would be used the way it currently works. Changing it to stop at the first successful server seems much more useful to me.
I'm aware of copy:'s failover= field, but it seems like I would have to double my quantity of copy statements and add a whole bunch of AddInstallable definitions in order to use it. Seems awkward. I just want it to use one of a list of servers.
-- Tod Oace, Intel Corporation <tod@intel.com>
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |