Re: [h-e-w] Re: Gnus, anyone?

[Robert Praetorius]

> It's seems that the OP is not familiar with GNU's definition.

     The OP is familiar with the FSF's definition of free and was just being 
spacy.  
However, the OP is a pluralist & sez: let a 1000 definitions of free bloom.  
Also the 
OP has been using Emacs since it was written in TECO (and ^R mode before that, 
'cuz we 
didn't have enough core) and although his mind thinks of it as free, his 
fingers are 
somewhat enslaved to the key bindings.

> http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html

     I concur that it woulda been good for this URL to appear earlier in the 
conversation.