[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: possible bug in pygments-parser
|
From: |
Shigio YAMAGUCHI |
|
Subject: |
Re: possible bug in pygments-parser |
|
Date: |
Sun, 19 Nov 2023 11:41:51 +0900 |
Hello,
> 1. The last few lines of /usr/share/gtags/PLUGIN_HOWTO.pygments should
> probably be deleted.
You are right. It should be maintained as a part of GNU Global.
> Line 30 of /usr/share/gtags/script/pygments_parser.py is ... EXUBERANT_CTAGS
> = "/usr/bin/etags"
That's obviously wrong and different from the original.
You should suggest it on Manjaro mailing list instead of here.
Regards,
Shigio
On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 12:39 AM Mandar Mitra <mandar.mitra@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I'm running global 6.6.10-1 on Arch / Manjaro Linux. Just wanted to check
> about a couple of issues on this discussion list before bothering the
> developers.
>
>
> 1. The last few lines of /usr/share/gtags/PLUGIN_HOWTO.pygments should
> probably be deleted. It currently reads:
>
> <begin quote>
> Pygments plug-in parser was written by Yoshitaro MAKISE.
> For detals, please see the following site:
> [https://github.com/yoshizow/global-pygments-plugin]
>
> Though it is considered a separate package, not part of GLOBAL proper,
> we included it for user's convenience.
> <end quote>
>
> But https://github.com/yoshizow/global-pygments-plugin says
>
> <begin quote>
> IMPORTANT NOTICE!
>
> global-pygments-plugin is now bundled with GNU GLOBAL.
> The development continues in the GLOBAL community and you can find the latest
> code there.
>
> This repository is no longer maintained and just remain for reference
> purposes.
> <end quote>
>
>
> 2. Line 30 of /usr/share/gtags/script/pygments_parser.py is
>
> EXUBERANT_CTAGS = "/usr/bin/etags"
>
> For me, etags is provided by the emacs package, instead of ctags /
> universal-ctags. etags does not accept the -x flag (line 142 of
> pygments_parser.py).
>
> So the command "gtags --gtagslabel=pygments" gives an error, while "gtags
> --gtagslabel=universal-ctags" works without problems.
>
> Would it be a good idea to just change etags to ctags in the above definition?
>
>
> Thanks,
> Mandar.
>
--
Shigio YAMAGUCHI <shigio@gnu.org>
PGP fingerprint:
26F6 31B4 3D62 4A92 7E6F 1C33 969C 3BE3 89DD A6EB