[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Help-glpk] Re: glpk and ATLAS/GSL
From: |
Oleg Gusev |
Subject: |
[Help-glpk] Re: glpk and ATLAS/GSL |
Date: |
Tue, 20 Jan 2004 11:49:28 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.4.1 |
> LAPACK (and therefore CLAPACK) does not have routines for general sparse
> matrices. Which routines do you mean?
I meant moderately sized non-sparse LP problems.
If you have lots of memory and several processors
that can be a big advantage. For some reason
the current glpk performs better on a p4, which was
a big surprise.
>The question is unclear.
If i will write a
gsl_solve_LP(gsl_matrix *A, gsl_vector *b, gsl_vector *c)
function for { Ax>b, min(cx) } LP problem, is it really
necessary to reallocate and refill A in a lpx_* way ?
Oleg.
- [Help-glpk] Re: glpk and ATLAS/GSL,
Oleg Gusev <=