help-glpk
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Help-glpk] Do I misunderstand LPX_K_ITMLM?


From: Robert Horvath
Subject: RE: [Help-glpk] Do I misunderstand LPX_K_ITMLM?
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 12:16:23 +0200

Could you supply an lp form of the problem? If I have some free time I could
do a little debug for you.

Robert

> -----Original Message-----
> From: address@hidden [mailto:help-
> address@hidden On Behalf Of Philip
> Warner
> Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 9:48 AM
> To: Pradeep; address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [Help-glpk] Do I misunderstand LPX_K_ITMLM?
> 
> At 03:17 PM 14/04/2004, Pradeep wrote:
> >lpx_set_int_parm(lp,LPX_K_ITLIM,<number of iter
> >required>)
> 
> I should have been a little more clear; this is actually what I did. I
> called:
> 
>      lpx_set_int_parm(lp,LPX_K_ITLIM,50)
> 
> and in some cases it does not terminate. I also tried higher and lower
> values, and it still does not terminate. Very odd.
> 
> I guess the ideal, maybe in a future release, would be to have a new API
> routine, lpx_terminate(lp) which would terminate the current call at the
> next most convenient spot. But I would like to get LPX_K_ITLIM to work
> with
> the MIP solver...
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Philip Warner                    |     __---_____
> Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd.   |----/       -  \
> (A.B.N. 75 008 659 498)          |          /(@)   ______---_
> Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81         |                 _________  \
> Fax: (+61) 03 5330 3172          |                 ___________ |
> Http://www.rhyme.com.au          |                /           \|
>                                   |    --________--
> PGP key available upon request,  |  /
> and from pgp.mit.edu:11371       |/
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Help-glpk mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-glpk





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]