[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Help-glpk] Linear Programming Relaxation
From: |
Andrew Makhorin |
Subject: |
Re: [Help-glpk] Linear Programming Relaxation |
Date: |
Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:38:20 +0300 |
> What I am trying to obtain is that though using LPR, the solution
> is bounded, but the solution does not satisfy what I need which is
> "x1+x2<=1" which means that "x1" and "x2" cannot co-exist together in
> a solution.
In mathematics "x1+x2<=1" does not mean "that x1 and x2 cannot co-exist
together in a solution"; it means that the sum of x1 and x2 is not
greater than 1. The constraint you need is "NOT x1 OR NOT x2"; this
constraint is *not* equivalent to "x1+x2<=1" until x1 and x2 are
restricted to be binary, and being non-convex this constraint cannot be
modeled within linear program (LP). If you restrict some variables to
be binary, you get integer program (MIP), not LP.
- Re: [Help-glpk] Linear Programming Relaxation, (continued)
- Re: [Help-glpk] Linear Programming Relaxation, David Bremner, 2009/11/25
- Re: [Help-glpk] Linear Programming Relaxation, RC Loh, 2009/11/25
- Re: [Help-glpk] Linear Programming Relaxation, Andrew Makhorin, 2009/11/25
- Re: [Help-glpk] Linear Programming Relaxation, RC Loh, 2009/11/26
- Re: [Help-glpk] Linear Programming Relaxation, Andrew Makhorin, 2009/11/27
- Re: [Help-glpk] Linear Programming Relaxation, RC Loh, 2009/11/29
- Re: [Help-glpk] Linear Programming Relaxation, Michael Hennebry, 2009/11/29
- Re: [Help-glpk] Linear Programming Relaxation, Andrew Makhorin, 2009/11/29
- Re: [Help-glpk] Linear Programming Relaxation, RC Loh, 2009/11/30
- Re: [Help-glpk] Linear Programming Relaxation, Ali Baharev, 2009/11/30
- Re: [Help-glpk] Linear Programming Relaxation,
Andrew Makhorin <=
- Re: [Help-glpk] Linear Programming Relaxation, Jeffrey Kantor, 2009/11/30
- Re: [Help-glpk] Linear Programming Relaxation, Jeffrey Kantor, 2009/11/29