[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Help-glpk] glpsol, arbitrary precision and large numbers
|
From: |
Edd Barrett |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Help-glpk] glpsol, arbitrary precision and large numbers |
|
Date: |
Fri, 29 Jun 2012 10:42:35 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 01:03:35PM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote:
> Which is false, so under this assignment the system in infeasible. The solver
> should have either tried a different assignment of either variables, or if it
> could not, then it should have reported the problem infeasible? Right?
Any thoughts on this? I am keen to figure out what went wrong here.
Cheers
--
Best Regards
Edd Barrett
http://www.theunixzoo.co.uk
- [Help-glpk] glpsol, arbitrary precision and large numbers, Edd Barrett, 2012/06/25
- Re: [Help-glpk] glpsol, arbitrary precision and large numbers, Andrew Makhorin, 2012/06/25
- Re: [Help-glpk] glpsol, arbitrary precision and large numbers, Edd Barrett, 2012/06/27
- Re: [Help-glpk] glpsol, arbitrary precision and large numbers, Andrew Makhorin, 2012/06/29
- Re: [Help-glpk] glpsol, arbitrary precision and large numbers, Edd Barrett, 2012/06/29
- Re: [Help-glpk] glpsol, arbitrary precision and large numbers, Andrew Makhorin, 2012/06/30
- Re: [Help-glpk] glpsol, arbitrary precision and large numbers, Michael Hennebry, 2012/06/30
- Re: [Help-glpk] glpsol, arbitrary precision and large numbers, Andrew Makhorin, 2012/06/30