[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
## Re: [Help-glpk] glpsol, arbitrary precision and large numbers

**From**: |
Edd Barrett |

**Subject**: |
Re: [Help-glpk] glpsol, arbitrary precision and large numbers |

**Date**: |
Fri, 29 Jun 2012 10:42:35 +0100 |

**User-agent**: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |

On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 01:03:35PM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote:
>* Which is false, so under this assignment the system in infeasible. The solver*
>* should have either tried a different assignment of either variables, or if it*
>* could not, then it should have reported the problem infeasible? Right?*
Any thoughts on this? I am keen to figure out what went wrong here.
Cheers
--
Best Regards
Edd Barrett
http://www.theunixzoo.co.uk

**[Help-glpk] glpsol, arbitrary precision and large numbers**, *Edd Barrett*, `2012/06/25`
**Re: [Help-glpk] glpsol, arbitrary precision and large numbers**, *Andrew Makhorin*, `2012/06/25`
**Re: [Help-glpk] glpsol, arbitrary precision and large numbers**, *Edd Barrett*, `2012/06/27`
**Re: [Help-glpk] glpsol, arbitrary precision and large numbers**,
*Edd Barrett* **<=**
**Re: [Help-glpk] glpsol, arbitrary precision and large numbers**, *glpk xypron*, `2012/06/29`
**Re: [Help-glpk] glpsol, arbitrary precision and large numbers**, *Andrew Makhorin*, `2012/06/29`
**Re: [Help-glpk] glpsol, arbitrary precision and large numbers**, *Edd Barrett*, `2012/06/29`
**Re: [Help-glpk] glpsol, arbitrary precision and large numbers**, *Andrew Makhorin*, `2012/06/30`
**Re: [Help-glpk] glpsol, arbitrary precision and large numbers**, *Michael Hennebry*, `2012/06/30`
**Re: [Help-glpk] glpsol, arbitrary precision and large numbers**, *Andrew Makhorin*, `2012/06/30`