[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: My experiences building GNATS 4.1.0

From: Chad Walstrom
Subject: Re: My experiences building GNATS 4.1.0
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 10:59:11 -0600
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i

By the way, it isn't GNATS 4.10.  You're about 9 releases in the future.

On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 10:21:44AM +0200, Mike M. Volokhov wrote:
> Another question is why build process so unclean (missing .c files,
> missing variables, some "magic" explicit rules at the end of makefile,
> and so on)?

Historical remnants.

> IMHO we should cleanup makefiles to be compliant to generic make rules
> or use GNU atomake framework (but I'm personally are not familiar with
> GNU build tools). Which way more preferred?

I would like to see a migration to automake and a single
file.  However, I didn't want to hold up rolling out 4.1.0 any longer
than necessary.  Now that we've reached that milestone, we can look into
cleaning it up a bit more.

Chad Walstrom <address@hidden> 
           assert(expired(knowledge)); /* core dump */

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]