[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: MULE shows gibberish; now what?
From: |
Peter J. Acklam |
Subject: |
Re: MULE shows gibberish; now what? |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Sep 2002 15:59:54 GMT |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
grossjoh@ls6.informatik.uni-dortmund.de (Kai Großjohann) wrote:
> Ilya Zakharevich <nospam-abuse@ilyaz.org> writes:
>
> > SPECIFICS of the problem1: when asked to show cyrillic, it
> > shows cyrillic indeed. However, the shown glyphs have no
> > relationship to the actual Cyrillic text (e.g., in the Hello,
> > World example). Do not have a slightest idea how to report it
> > in more details...
>
> IIRC, there are two popular encodings for Cyrillic, and maybe
> Emacs thinks it's using a font in the foo encoding but the real
> font is in the bar encoding?
>
> Put point on a Cyrillic character and type C-u C-x =, this tells
> you stuff, including the charset that Emacs thinks this
> character is in.
Perhaps you also know how I can make Emacs open a UTF-8-encoded
file correctly? In my ~/.emacs I now enabled UTF-8 in every way I
can think of
(set-buffer-file-coding-system 'utf-8-unix)
(set-clipboard-coding-system 'utf-8-unix)
(set-keyboard-coding-system 'utf-8-unix)
(set-next-selection-coding-system 'utf-8-unix)
(set-selection-coding-system 'utf-8-unix)
(set-terminal-coding-system 'utf-8-unix)
(set-w32-system-coding-system 'utf-8-unix)
(prefer-coding-system 'utf-8-unix)
and I have enabled multibyte characters, but still Emacs always
opens a UTF-8 file as "unibyte no-conversion". Using
C-x RET c utf-8 RET C-x C-f
to open a file is rather awkward.
Peter
--
No electrons used in the production of this message were harmed or
mistreated in any manner.
- MULE shows gibberish; now what?, Ilya Zakharevich, 2002/09/24
- Re: MULE shows gibberish; now what?, Kai Großjohann, 2002/09/24
- Re: MULE shows gibberish; now what?,
Peter J. Acklam <=
- Re: MULE shows gibberish; now what?, Kai Großjohann, 2002/09/24
- Re: MULE shows gibberish; now what?, Peter J. Acklam, 2002/09/28
- Re: MULE shows gibberish; now what?, Kai Großjohann, 2002/09/28
- Message not available
- Re: MULE shows gibberish; now what?, Kai Großjohann, 2002/09/28
- Re: MULE shows gibberish; now what?, Peter J. Acklam, 2002/09/28
- Re: MULE shows gibberish; now what?, Kai Großjohann, 2002/09/28
- Re: MULE shows gibberish; now what?, Peter J. Acklam, 2002/09/29
- Re: MULE shows gibberish; now what?, Kai Großjohann, 2002/09/29
- Re: MULE shows gibberish; now what?, Peter J. Acklam, 2002/09/29
- Re: MULE shows gibberish; now what?, Kai Großjohann, 2002/09/29