[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: w3 under development or not?
|
From: |
A . L . Meyers |
|
Subject: |
Re: w3 under development or not? |
|
Date: |
Wed, 12 Nov 2003 11:21:59 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
IMHO emacs-w3m is much better and really works. However, purists will
rightly observe that w3m is not written in elisp.
Cheers!
Lucien
--
If you receive this by error, please delete it and inform the sender.
Key fingerprint: 8994 CFDD 9C60 C978 A488 689F 5DCC EFC4 4D36 580D
To Big Brother Echelon from "spook":
opus dei fissionable Kandahar cracking Honduras cryptographic BATF Iraq
- w3 under development or not?, Joe Corneli, 2003/11/10
- Re: w3 under development or not?, Friedrich Dominicus, 2003/11/13
- Re: w3 under development or not?, Shane, 2003/11/14
- Poppong mail (Re: w3 under development or not?), Gian Uberto Lauri, 2003/11/14
- Re: w3 under development or not?, Peter Lee, 2003/11/14
- Re: w3 under development or not?, Ted Zlatanov, 2003/11/14
- Re: w3 under development or not?, Peter Lee, 2003/11/14
- Re: w3 under development or not?, Ted Zlatanov, 2003/11/14
- Re: w3 under development or not?, Peter Lee, 2003/11/14
- Re: w3 under development or not?, Juri Linkov, 2003/11/15