[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Canonical add-hook idiom
From: |
Henrik Enberg |
Subject: |
Re: Canonical add-hook idiom |
Date: |
Sat, 15 Nov 2003 19:27:43 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Oliver Scholz <alkibiades@gmx.de> writes:
> Bob Nelson <bnelson@nelsonbe.com> writes:
>
>> What is the preferred approach given these examples:
>>
>> 1). (add-hook 'some-mode-hook (lambda () [...]
>
> I definitely prefer (1).
>
> Some would prefer #'(lambda () ...), which for the Lisp interpreter
> is the same as (3). But AFAIK this is just a Common Lisp idiom and
> it makes no difference in Emacs Lisp.
In addition using #'(lambda () ...) or '(lambda () ...) means the lambda
form won't be compiled if the file is.