[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C-x v g going further back in time?
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: C-x v g going further back in time? |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Jan 2004 16:44:54 GMT |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
> I was actually thinking of putting the cache logic into
> `vc-print-log', which can be invoked independently of the 'C-x v g',
> 'C-x o', 'L' path. But I think if they invoke 'C-x v l' directly,
How 'bout splitting "the cache logic" into "setting up the cache info"
(done in vc-print-log) and checking the cache (done in `L' only if you
don't want it to happen in `C-x v g') ?
The caching should not depend on the buffer's name. Making it possible to
display logs in a different buffer would probably be good, but it should be
a completely independent decision.
Stefan
- C-x v g going further back in time?, Benjamin Rutt, 2004/01/08
- Re: C-x v g going further back in time?, Andrew Taylor, 2004/01/08
- Re: C-x v g going further back in time?, Benjamin Rutt, 2004/01/08
- Re: C-x v g going further back in time?, Stefan Monnier, 2004/01/08
- Re: C-x v g going further back in time?, Benjamin Rutt, 2004/01/20
- Re: C-x v g going further back in time?, Stefan Monnier, 2004/01/20
- Re: C-x v g going further back in time?, Benjamin Rutt, 2004/01/25
- Re: C-x v g going further back in time?, Stefan Monnier, 2004/01/26
- Re: C-x v g going further back in time?, Benjamin Rutt, 2004/01/26
- Re: C-x v g going further back in time?,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: C-x v g going further back in time?, Stefan Monnier, 2004/01/26
Re: C-x v g going further back in time?, Benjamin Rutt, 2004/01/11