[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: CL compatibility question

From: Miles Bader
Subject: Re: CL compatibility question
Date: 07 May 2004 07:02:46 +0900

Joe Corneli <address@hidden> writes:
> (defmacro defbashfun (name lambda &body body)
>   `(defun ,name (&rest $@)
>      (apply (lambda ,lambda ,@body) $@)))
> Why is this?  Are there plans that would change this behavior in the
> future?

Use &rest, not &body (in CL, &body is really just &rest with a hint to
the pretty-printer).

[|nurgle|]  ddt- demonic? so quake will have an evil kinda setting? one that
            will  make every christian in the world foamm at the mouth?
[iddt]      nurg, that's the goal

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]