[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: using apt-utils
From: |
Sebastian Luque |
Subject: |
Re: using apt-utils |
Date: |
Sat, 21 Aug 2004 16:48:05 -0500 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.6.2 |
On Sat, 21 August 2004 03:54 -0500, Matt Hodges wrote:
> With --no-site-file, you will have to load apt-utils.el by hand.
I still got the same error though : (
> These are not benign in this context, and need to be discarded. Can
> you test a fix for the version of apt-utils.el in testing which I've
> posted at:
>
> <URL:http://www.tc.bham.ac.uk/~matt/emacs/apt-utils.el>
Success! I loaded that version and it works OK (I only typed
'apt-utils-show-package' 'emacs', and got sensible output), both with a
simple 'emacs', or with the two options you suggested previously.
I'm very hesitant to modify my sources.list, so as to eliminate the
"...couldn't stat source package list..." messages. I still need to learn
much about apt to feel comfortable doing that. Any suggestions as to how to
deal with this?
Thank you very much for such a great tool.
Sebastian
- using apt-utils, Sebastian Luque, 2004/08/20
- using apt-utils, Sebastian Luque, 2004/08/20
- Re: using apt-utils, Matt Hodges, 2004/08/20
- Re: using apt-utils, Sebastian Luque, 2004/08/20
- Message not available
- Re: using apt-utils, Sebastian Luque, 2004/08/20
- Re: using apt-utils, Matt Hodges, 2004/08/20
- Re: using apt-utils, Sebastian Luque, 2004/08/20
- Re: using apt-utils, Matt Hodges, 2004/08/21
- Re: using apt-utils,
Sebastian Luque <=
- Re: using apt-utils, Kai Grossjohann, 2004/08/22
- Re: using apt-utils, Matt Hodges, 2004/08/23