[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: reading binary, non-unix file
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: reading binary, non-unix file |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Oct 2004 09:41:05 -0700 |
Like "let", but the bindings are sequential and interdependent (not parallel
and independent). You can use variables bound previously in subsequent
variable bindings of the same "let*".
E.g.
(let* ((foo 2) ; define foo
(bar (* 3 foo))) ; use foo to define bar
(format "foo: %s, bar: %s" foo bar))
=>
foo: 2, bar: 6
-----Original Message-----
Can someone explain the operation of the 'let*' operation?
- reading binary, non-unix file, Mickey Ferguson, 2004/10/22
- Re: reading binary, non-unix file, J. David Boyd, 2004/10/22
- Message not available
- Re: reading binary, non-unix file, Mickey Ferguson, 2004/10/22
- Re: reading binary, non-unix file, Mathias Dahl, 2004/10/25
- Re: reading binary, non-unix file, Mickey Ferguson, 2004/10/25
- Re: reading binary, non-unix file, Daniel Pittman, 2004/10/25
- Re: reading binary, non-unix file, Mathias Dahl, 2004/10/26
- Re: reading binary, non-unix file, Mickey Ferguson, 2004/10/26
- Re: reading binary, non-unix file, Mathias Dahl, 2004/10/27
- Re: reading binary, non-unix file, Mickey Ferguson, 2004/10/27
- RE: reading binary, non-unix file,
Drew Adams <=
- Re: reading binary, non-unix file, Reiner Steib, 2004/10/27
- Re: reading binary, non-unix file, Mickey Ferguson, 2004/10/26
- Re: reading binary, non-unix file, Kevin Rodgers, 2004/10/26
Re: reading binary, non-unix file, Daniel Pittman, 2004/10/23