[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?
From: |
Xavier Maillard |
Subject: |
Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why? |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Dec 2005 18:40:47 +0100 |
User-agent: |
RMAIL/GNU Emacs 22.0.50.1 |
From: Lennart Borgman <lennart.borgman.073@student.lu.se>
Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, Emacs Devel <emacs-devel@gnu.org>
Mathias Dahl wrote:
>How about
>
> There are several ways you can do this. You can use the arrow
> keys or you can use C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n. Generally, many find
> the latter more efficient in the long run because it keeps your
> hands in the standard position. These characters are equivalent
> to the four arrow keys like this:
>
>Thus avoiding expressions like "but it is generally more..." which
>forces an opinion in the user. IMHO, of course. :)
>
>
I vote for this one! It addresses the newbie which is the purpose.
My vote goes to this one too.
Xavier
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, (continued)
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Xavier Maillard, 2005/12/15
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, don provan, 2005/12/17
- Message not available
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Mathias Dahl, 2005/12/19
- Message not available
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Stefan Monnier, 2005/12/15
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Mathias Dahl, 2005/12/15
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Per Abrahamsen, 2005/12/15
- RE: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Drew Adams, 2005/12/15
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Mathias Dahl, 2005/12/15
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Lennart Borgman, 2005/12/15
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Lennart Borgman, 2005/12/15
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?,
Xavier Maillard <=
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Lennart Borgman, 2005/12/15
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/12/16
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/12/15
- Prev by Date:
RE: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?
- Next by Date:
Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?
- Previous by thread:
Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?
- Next by thread:
Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?
- Index(es):