[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: OT -- An extremely dumb curiosity question?
From: |
Robert Thorpe |
Subject: |
Re: OT -- An extremely dumb curiosity question? |
Date: |
12 Feb 2007 00:29:48 -0800 |
User-agent: |
G2/1.0 |
On Feb 10, 9:53 am, Eli Zaretskii <e...@gnu.org> wrote:
> > From: "Robert Thorpe" <rtho...@realworldtech.com>
> > Date: 9 Feb 2007 09:26:56 -0800
>
> > If I didn't interact with so many people who use Outlook I'd probably
> > use it for email.
>
> What prevents you from using Emacs for email, even though your
> correspondents use Outlook? In other words, what's so special with
> Outlook that Emacs cannot cope with?
The company I work is a MS shop. They use exchange servers and the
only email systems they mandate is Outlook. Everyone uses the meeting
planning features of Outlook.
I don't use it at home, but that's why I have to use it at work.
Re: OT -- An extremely dumb curiosity question?, Hadron, 2007/02/08
Re: OT -- An extremely dumb curiosity question?, Robert D. Crawford, 2007/02/08
Re: OT -- An extremely dumb curiosity question?, Rjjd, 2007/02/08
Re: OT -- An extremely dumb curiosity question?, Robert Thorpe, 2007/02/09
Message not available
- Re: OT -- An extremely dumb curiosity question?,
Robert Thorpe <=
Re: OT -- An extremely dumb curiosity question?, Tim X, 2007/02/11
Re: OT -- An extremely dumb curiosity question?, Edward Dodge, 2007/02/14