[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
font-lock-defaults doesn't work??
From: |
Peter Tury |
Subject: |
font-lock-defaults doesn't work?? |
Date: |
13 Apr 2007 08:35:48 -0700 |
User-agent: |
G2/1.0 |
Hi,
I am trying to create a new major mode from scratch. I found that
syntax parsing doesn't work properly sometimes. Why? Am I missed
something or this is a bug?
Details:
I have the following defun for start. If I remove the "secretly
must-to-have parts" (see below) then M-: (syntax-ppss) returns lists
as if it would parse a lisp buffer: characters in a line after `;'
reported as in-comment chars, and real comments (= delimited by `/*'
and `*/' doesn't recognized as comments. However, fontification works
nicely -- most of the time, but not always: _sometimes_, if I put `;'
inside a /*-comment and then delete this `;', then comment-color is
removed... More interestingly once I got nil for the value of
font-lock-syntax-table (queried via C-h v font-lock-syntax-table from
the buffer where I activated this new mode via M-x t-mode
previously)!?
So it seems syntax parsing is wrong and fontification is
indeterministic iff I set(??) font-lock-syntax-table via
font-lock-defaults, but everything works well if I directly set it via
set-syntax-table.
Is this normal? Do you know the reason? Should I report it as a bug?
(defun t-mode ()
"test major mode"
(interactive)
(kill-all-local-variables)
(setq major-mode (quote t-mode))
(setq mode-name "t-mode")
;; secretly must-to-have parts -- start
(let ((t-syntax-table (make-syntax-table)))
(modify-syntax-entry ?/ ". 14" t-syntax-table)
(modify-syntax-entry ?* ". 23" t-syntax-table)
(set-syntax-table t-syntax-table))
;; secretly must-to-have parts -- end
(set (make-local-variable 'font-lock-defaults)
'(nil nil t
((?/ . ". 14")
(?* . ". 23"))))
(run-mode-hooks 't-mode-hook))
Note: emacs' help writes for font-lock-syntax-table: "this is normally
set via `font-lock-defaults'", while elisp manual writes for
make-syntax-table (in 35.3): "most major mode syntax tables are
created in this way" -- however I would think that make-syntax-table
is unusable if I set font-lock-syntax-table via font-lock-
defaults...??
(I use patched EmacsW32 v feb.20.2007, and haven't tested the
situation with -Q...)
Thanks for your help in advance,
P
- font-lock-defaults doesn't work??,
Peter Tury <=